×
近期发现有不法分子冒充我刊与作者联系,借此进行欺诈等不法行为,请广大作者加以鉴别,如遇诈骗行为,请第一时间与我刊编辑部联系确认(《中国物理C》(英文)编辑部电话:010-88235947,010-88236950),并作报警处理。
本刊再次郑重声明:
(1)本刊官方网址为cpc.ihep.ac.cn和https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1674-1137
(2)本刊采编系统作者中心是投稿的唯一路径,该系统为ScholarOne远程稿件采编系统,仅在本刊投稿网网址(https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/cpc)设有登录入口。本刊不接受其他方式的投稿,如打印稿投稿、E-mail信箱投稿等,若以此种方式接收投稿均为假冒。
(3)所有投稿均需经过严格的同行评议、编辑加工后方可发表,本刊不存在所谓的“编辑部内部征稿”。如果有人以“编辑部内部人员”名义帮助作者发稿,并收取发表费用,均为假冒。
                  
《中国物理C》(英文)编辑部
2024年10月30日

Photo-production of lowest ${\boldsymbol\Sigma^{*}_{\bf 1/2^-}}$ state within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach

Figures(5) / Tables(1)

Get Citation
Yun-He Lyu, Han Zhang, Neng-Chang Wei, Bai-Cian Ke, En Wang and Ju-Jun Xie. Photo-production of lowest ${ \displaystyle\Sigma^*_{1/2^-} }$ state within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach[J]. Chinese Physics C. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acc4ab
Yun-He Lyu, Han Zhang, Neng-Chang Wei, Bai-Cian Ke, En Wang and Ju-Jun Xie. Photo-production of lowest ${ \displaystyle\Sigma^*_{1/2^-} }$ state within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach[J]. Chinese Physics C.  doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acc4ab shu
Milestone
Received: 2023-01-20
Article Metric

Article Views(968)
PDF Downloads(14)
Cited by(0)
Policy on re-use
To reuse of Open Access content published by CPC, for content published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (“CC CY”), the users don’t need to request permission to copy, distribute and display the final published version of the article and to create derivative works, subject to appropriate attribution.
通讯作者: 陈斌, [email protected]
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Email This Article

Title:
Email:

Photo-production of lowest ${\boldsymbol\Sigma^{*}_{\bf 1/2^-}}$ state within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach

  • 1. School of Physics and Microelectronics, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • 2. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
  • 3. Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • 4. Southern Center for Nuclear-Science Theory (SCNT), Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huizhou 516000, China

Abstract: Because the lowest $ \Sigma^{*} $ state with quantum numbers spin-parity $ J^{P} =1/2^{-} $ is far from being established experimentally and theoretically, we perform a theoretical study on the $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^-} $ photo-production within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach. Considering that $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^-} $ couples to the $ \bar{K}N $ channel, we study the contributions from the t-channel K exchange diagram. Moreover, the contributions from the t-channel $ K^* $ exchange, s-channel nucleon pole, u-channel Σ exchange, and contact term are considered. The differential and total cross sections of the process $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ are predicted with our model parameters. The results should help in experimentally searching for the $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^-} $ state in the future.

    HTML

    I.   INTRODUCTION
    • The study of the low-lying excited $ \Lambda^* $ and $ \Sigma^* $ hyperon resonances is one of the most important issues in hadron physics. In particular, since $ \Lambda(1405) $ was experimentally discovered [1, 2], its nature has garnered significant attention [38], and one explanation for $ \Lambda(1405) $ is the $ \bar{K}N $ hadronic molecular state [915]. In addition, for the isospin $ I=1 $ partner of $ \Lambda(1405) $, the lowest $ \Sigma^{*}_{1/2^{-}} $ is crucial to understand light baryon spectra. At present, $ \Sigma^*(1620) $ with $ J^P = 1/2^{-} $ is listed in the latest version of the Review of Particle Physics (RPP) [16]. It should be emphasized that the $ \Sigma^*(1620) $ state is a one-star baryon resonance. Many studies indicate that the lowest $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^-} $resonance is still far from being established, and its mass has been predicted to lie in the range $ 1380 \sim 1500 $ MeV [13, 1720]. Thus, searching for the lowest $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^-} $ is helpful for understanding low-lying excited baryons with $ J^P=1/2^- $ and light flavor baryon spectra.

      The analyses of relevant data on the process $ K^- p \to \Lambda \pi^+\pi^- $ suggest that a $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^{-}} $ resonance may exist with a mass of approximately 1380 MeV [17, 18], which is consistent with the predictions of unquenched quark model [21]. The analyses of $ K^{*}\Sigma $ photo-production also indicate that $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^{-}} $ is possibly buried under the $ \Sigma^*(1385) $ peak with a mass of 1380 MeV [22], and the search for $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^{-}} $ in the process $ \Lambda^+_c \to \eta\pi^+\Lambda $ has been proposed [23]. A more delicate analysis of CLAS data on the process $ \gamma p \to K \Sigma \pi $ [24] suggests that the $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^{-}} $ peak should be around 1430 MeV [13]. In Refs. [25, 26], we suggest searching for such a state in the processes $ \chi_{c0}(1P) \to \bar{\Sigma} \Sigma\pi $ and $ \chi_{c0}(1P)\to \bar{\Lambda}\Sigma\pi $. In addition, in Ref. [27], one $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^{-}} $ state was found with a mass of approximately 1400 MeV by solving coupled channel scattering equations, and Ref. [28] suggests to search for this state in the photo-production process $ \gamma p \to K^{+} \Sigma^{*0}_{1/2^-} $.

      It is worth mentioning that a $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ resonance with $ J^P =1/2^- $ has been listed on the previous version of the RPP [29]. As early as 1970, the $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ resonance was reported in the $ \Lambda \pi^{+} $, $ \Sigma \pi $, and $ p\bar{K}^{0} $ channels of $ \pi^+ p $ scattering in the Princeton-Pennsylvania Accelerator 15-in. hydrogen bubble chamber [30, 31]. In 2004, a bump structure around 1480 MeV was observed in the $ K^0_S p(\bar{p}) $ invariant mass spectrum of inclusive deep inelastic $ ep $ scattering by the ZEUS Collaboration [32]. Furthermore, a signal for a resonance at $ 1480 \pm 15 $ MeV with a width of $ 60 \pm 15 $ MeV was observed in the process $ pp \to K^{+}pY^{*0} $ [33]. $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ has been investigated theoretically within different models [3437]. In Ref. [37], S-wave meson-baryon interactions with strangeness $ S=-1 $ were studied within the unitary chiral approach, and one narrow pole with a pole position of $1468-{\rm i} \ 13 \ \rm MeV$ was found in the second Riemann sheet, which may be associated with the $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ resonance. However, $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ signals are insignificant, and the existence of this state still needs to be confirmed within more precise experimental measurements.

      Photo-production reactions have been used to study the excited hyperon states $ \Sigma^* $ and $ \Lambda^* $, and the LEPS [38] and CLAS [24] Collaborations have accumulated considerable relevant experimental data. For instance, with these data, we analyzed the process $ \gamma p\to K\Lambda^*(1405) $ to deepen our understanding of the nature of $ \Lambda^*(1405) $ in Ref. [39]. To confirm the existence of $ \Sigma^*(1480) $, we propose to investigate the process $ \gamma N \to K\Sigma^*(1480) $ within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach.

      Considering the $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ signal was first observed in the $ \pi^+\Lambda $ invariant mass distribution of the process $\pi^+ p\to \pi^+K^+\Lambda$, and the significance is approximately $ 3 \sim 4 \sigma $ [31], we search for charged $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ in the process $\gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-}$, which may also avoid the contributions of possible excited $ \Lambda^* $ states. We consider the t-, s-, and u-channel diagrams in the Born approximation by employing the effective Lagrangian approach, and the t-channel K/$ K^{*} $ exchanges terms within the Regge model. Then, we calculate the differential and total cross sections of the process $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $, which helps the experimental search for $ \Sigma^*_{1/2^-} $.

      This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, the theoretical formalism for studying the $ \gamma n \to K^+ \Sigma^{*-}(1480) $ reaction is presented. The numerical results of the total and differential cross sections and discussion are shown in Sec. III. Finally, a brief summary is given in the last section.

    II.   FORMALISM
    • The reaction mechanisms of the $ \Sigma^*(1480) (\equiv \Sigma^*) $ photo-production process are depicted in Fig. 1, where we consider the contributions from the t-channel K and $ K^* $ exchange terms, s-channel nucleon pole term, u-channel Σ exchange term, and contact term.

      Figure 1.  Mechanisms of the $ \gamma n \to K^+\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ process. (a) t-channel K/$ K^* $ exchange terms, (b) s-channel nuclear term, (c) u-channel Σ exchange term, and (d) contact term. $ k_{1} $, $ k_{2} $, $ p_{1} $, and $ p_{2} $ represent the four-momenta of the initial photon, kaon, neutron, and $ \Sigma^*(1480) $, respectively.

      To compute the scattering amplitudes of the Feynman diagrams shown in Fig. 1 within the effective Lagrangian approach, we use the Lagrangian densities for the electromagnetic and strong interaction vertices, as in Refs. [28, 4045],

      $ \mathcal{L}_{\gamma K K} = -{\rm i} e\left[K^{\dagger}\left(\partial_{\mu} K\right)-\left(\partial_{\mu} K^{\dagger}\right) K\right] A^{\mu}, $

      (1)

      $ \mathcal{L}_{\gamma K K^*}= g_{\gamma K K^*} \epsilon^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta} \partial_\mu A_\nu\partial_\alpha K_\beta^{*}K, $

      (2)

      $ \mathcal{L}_{\gamma N N} = -e\bar{N}\left[ \gamma_{\mu}\hat{e} - \frac{\hat{\kappa}_{N}}{2M_{N}}\sigma_{\mu \nu}\partial^{\nu}\right]A^{\mu}N, $

      (3)

      $ \mathcal{L}_{\gamma \Sigma \Sigma^{*}} =\frac{e\mu_{\Sigma \Sigma^{*}}}{2M_{N}}\bar{\Sigma}\gamma_{5}\sigma_{\mu \nu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}\Sigma^{*}+ {\rm h.c.}, $

      (4)

      $ \mathcal{L}_{K N\Sigma} = -{\rm i} g_{KN\Sigma}\bar{N}\gamma_{5}\Sigma K + {\rm h.c.}, $

      (5)

      $ \mathcal{L}_{K^{*} N\Sigma^{*}} = {\rm i}\frac{g_{K^{*}N\Sigma^{*}}}{\sqrt{3}}\bar{K}^{*\mu}\bar{\Sigma}^{*}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{5}N + {\rm h.c.}, $

      (6)

      $ \mathcal{L}_{K N\Sigma^{*}} = g_{KN\Sigma^{*}}\bar{K}\bar{\Sigma}^*N+{\rm h.c.}, $

      (7)

      where $ e(=\sqrt{4\pi\alpha}) $ is the elementary charge unit, $ A^{\mu} $ is the photon field, and $ \hat{e}\equiv (1+\tau_{3})/2 $ denotes the charge operator acting on the nucleon field. $ \hat{\kappa}_{N} \equiv \kappa_{p} \hat{e}+\kappa_{n}(1-\hat{e}) $ is the anomalous magnetic moment, and we take $ \kappa_{n}= -1.913 $ for the neutron [16]. $ M_N $ and $ M_{\Sigma} $ denote the masses of the nucleon and the ground-state of the Σ hyperon, respectively. The strong coupling $ g_{KN\Sigma} $ is taken to be 4.09 from Refs. [4648]. $ g_{\gamma K K^{*}}=0.254\ \rm GeV^{-1} $ is determined from the experimental data of $\Gamma_{K^{*} \to K^+ \gamma}$ [16], and the value of $ g_{K^{*}N\Sigma^{*}}=-3.26-{\rm i}~0.06 $ is taken from Ref. [27]. In addition, the coupling $ g_{KN\Sigma^{*}}=8.74 $ GeV is taken from Ref. [37], and the transition magnetic moment $ \mu_{\Sigma\Sigma^*}=1.28 $ is taken from Ref. [28].

      In addition to the pseudoscalar coupling of Eq. (5), the vertex of $ KN\Sigma $ may be described with the Lagrangian density of axial-vector coupling as follows [49, 50]

      $ \mathcal{L}_{KN\Sigma}=-\frac{g_{KN\Sigma}}{2M_N} \bar{N}\gamma_5\gamma_\mu (\partial^\mu K) \Sigma + {\rm h.c.}. $

      (8)

      We discuss the difference between the two schemes in the next section. In this work, we perform the calculations with the Lagrangian density of Eq. (5) for the vertex of $ KN\Sigma $ in the following.

      With the effective interaction Lagrangian densities given above, the invariant scattering amplitudes are defined as

      $ \mathcal{M} =\bar{u}_{\Sigma^{*}}(p_{2},s_{\Sigma^{*}})\mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{h}u_{N}(k_{2},s_{p})\epsilon_{\mu}(k_{1},\lambda), $

      (9)

      where $ u_{\Sigma^{*}} $ and $ u_{N} $ represent the Dirac spinors, $ \epsilon_{\mu}(k_{1},\lambda) $ is the photon polarization vector, and the sub-index h corresponds to the different diagrams of Fig. 1. The reduced amplitudes $ \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{h} $ are written as

      $ \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{K^{*}} = \frac{g_{\gamma KK^{*}}g_{K^{*}N\Sigma^{*}}}{\sqrt{3}(t-M^2_{K^{*}})}\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}k_{1\alpha}k_{2\beta}\gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{5}, $

      (10)

      $ \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{K^-} = -2{\rm i} \frac{eg_{KN\Sigma^{*}}}{t-M^{2}_{K}}k_{2}^{\mu}, $

      (11)

      $ \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{\Sigma^-} = -{\rm i} \frac{e\mu_{\Sigma\Sigma^{*}}g_{KN\Sigma}}{2M_{n}(u-M^2_{\Sigma})}(\not q_{u}- M_{\Sigma})\sigma^{\mu \nu}k_{1\nu}, $

      (12)

      $ \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{n} = \frac{\kappa_{n}g_{KN\Sigma^{*}}}{2M_{n}(s-M_{n}^{2})} \sigma^{\mu\nu}k_{1\nu}(\not q_{s}+M_{n}). $

      (13)

      To maintain gauge invariance in the full photoproduction amplitudes considered here, we adopt the amplitude of the contact term

      $ \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{c} = -{\rm i} eg_{KN\Sigma^{*}}\frac{p_{2}^{\mu}}{p_{2}\cdot k_{1}}, $

      (14)

      for $ \gamma n \to K^{+} \Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $.

      It is known that the Reggeon exchange mechanism plays a crucial role at high energies and forward angles [5154]; thus, we adopt the Regge model when modeling the t-channel K and $ K^{*} $ contributions by replacing the usual pole-like Feynman propagator with the corresponding Regge propagators as follows

      $ \begin{aligned}[b]& \frac{1}{t-M^{2}_{K}} \to \mathcal{F} ^{\rm Regge}_{K}\\ =& \left( \frac{s}{s_{0}^{K}}\right ) ^{\alpha_{K}(t)} \frac{\pi \alpha^{\prime}_{K}}{{\rm sin}(\pi \alpha_{K}(t))\Gamma(1+\alpha_{K}(t))}, \end{aligned} $

      (15)

      $ \begin{aligned}[b]& \frac{1}{t-M^{2}_{K^{*}}} \to \mathcal{F}^{\rm Regge}_{K^{*}} \\= &\left( \frac{s}{s_{0}^{K^{*}}}\right ) ^{\alpha_{K^{*}}(t)-1} \frac{\pi \alpha^{\prime}_{K^{*}}}{{\rm sin}(\pi \alpha_{K^{*}}(t))\Gamma(\alpha_{K^{*}}(t))}, \end{aligned} $

      (16)

      where $ \alpha_{K}(t)=0.7\; {\rm GeV}^{-2}\times(t-M_{K}^{2}) $ and $\alpha_{K^{*}}(t)=1+ 0.83 {\rm GeV}^{-2}\times(t-M_{K^{*}}^{2})$ are the linear Reggeon trajectories. The constants $ s^{K}_{0} $ and $ s^{K^{*}}_{0} $ are determined to be 3.0 GeV$ ^{2} $ and 1.5 GeV$ ^{2} $, respectively [55]. Here, $ \alpha'_K $ and $ \alpha'_{K^*} $ are the Regge-slopes.

      Then, the full photo-production amplitudes for the $ \gamma n \to K^+ \Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ reaction can be expressed as

      $ \begin{aligned}[b] \mathcal{M}^{\mu} =& \left(\mathcal{M}_{K^-}^{\mu} + \mathcal{M}^{\mu}_{c}\right)\left(t-M_{K}^{2}\right) \mathcal{F} ^{\rm Regge}_{K}+ \mathcal{M}_{\Sigma^-}^{\mu}f_{u} \\ &+ \mathcal{M}_{K^{*}}^{\mu}\left(t-M_{K^{*}}^{2}\right) \mathcal{F}^{\rm Regge}_{K^*} +\mathcal{M}_{n}^{\mu}f_{s}, \end{aligned} $

      (17)

      where $ \mathcal{F} ^{\rm Regge}_{K} $ and $ \mathcal{F}^{\rm Regge}_{K*} $ represent the Regge propagators. The form factors $ f_{s} $ and $ f_{u} $ are included to suppress the large momentum transfer of the intermediate particles and describe their off-shell behavior because the intermediate hadrons are not point-like particles. For s-channel and u-channel baryon exchanges, we use the following form factors [40, 56]

      $ \begin{eqnarray} f_{i}(q_{i}^{2}) = \left[\frac{\Lambda_{i}^{4}}{\Lambda_{i}^{4} + (q_{i}^{2}-M_{i}^{2})^{2}}\right]^{2}, i=s,u \end{eqnarray} $

      (18)

      where $ M_{i} $ and $ q_{i} $ are the masses and four-momenta of the intermediate baryons, and $ \Lambda_{i} $ represents the cut-off values for the baryon exchange diagrams. In this study, we take $\Lambda_s= \Lambda_u=1.5$ GeV and discuss the results with different cut-offs.

      Finally, the unpolarized differential cross section in the center of mass (c.m.) frame for the $ \gamma n \to K\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^{-}} $ reaction reads as

      $ \begin{eqnarray} \frac{{\rm d}\sigma}{{\rm d}\Omega} = \frac{M_{N}M_{\Sigma^{*}}|\vec{k}_{1}^{\rm c.m.}||\vec{k}_{2} ^{\rm c.m.}|}{8\pi^{2}(s-M_{N}^{2})^{2}}\sum_{\lambda,s_{p},s_{\Sigma^{*}}}^{}|\mathcal{M}|^{2}, \end{eqnarray} $

      (19)

      where s denotes the invariant mass square of the center of mass (c.m.) frame for $ \Sigma^{*}_{1/2^{-}} $ photo-production, and ${\rm d}\Omega = 2\pi {\rm d}{{\rm cos\theta} _{\rm c.m.}}$, with $ \theta_{\rm c.m.} $ as the polar outgoing K scattering angle. Here, $ \vec{k}_1^{\rm c.m.} $ and $ \vec{k}_{2} ^{\rm c.m.} $ are the three-momenta of the photon and K meson in the c.m. frame,

      $ |\vec{k}_1^{\rm c.m.}| = \frac{s-M_N^2}{2\sqrt{s}}, $

      (20)

      $ |\vec{k}_2^{\rm c.m.}| = \frac{\sqrt{\left[ s-(M_{\Sigma^*}+M_K)^2\right]\left[s-(M_{\Sigma^*}-M_K)^2\right]}}{2\sqrt{s}}. $

      (21)
    III.   NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
    • In this section, we present our numerical results on the differential and total cross sections for the $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ reaction. The masses of the mesons and baryons are taken from the RPP [16], as given in Table 1. In addition, the mass and width of $\Sigma^*(1480)$ are $ M=1480\pm15 $ MeV and $ \Gamma=60\pm15 $ MeV, respectively [29].

      ParticleMass$/\rm MeV$
      n939.565
      $ \Sigma^{-} $1197.449
      $ K^{+} $493.677
      $ K^{-} $493.677
      $ K^{*} $891.66

      Table 1.  Particle masses used in this study.

      First, we show the angle dependence of the differential cross sections for the $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ reaction in Fig. 2, where the center-of-mass energies $ W=\sqrt{s} $ varies from $ 2.0 $ to $ 2.8 $GeV. The black curves labeled as "Total" are the results of all the contributions from the t-, s-, and u-channels and the contact term. The blue-dot and red-dashed curves represent the contributions from the u-channel Σ exchange and t-channel K exchange mechanisms, respectively. The magenta-dot-dashed and green-dot curves correspond to the contributions from the s-channel and t-channel $ K^{*} $ exchange diagrams, respectively, whereas the cyan-dot-dashed curves represent the contributions from the contact term. According to the differential cross sections, we find that the t-channel K meson exchange term plays an important role at forward angles for the process $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $, mainly because of the Regge effects of t-channel K exchange. The K-Reggeon exchange exhibits a steadily increasing behavior with $ {\rm cos}\theta_{\rm c.m.} $ and falls off drastically at very forward angles, which is consistent with the results of Ref. [28]. In the appendix, we show that the contribution from the t-channel K exchange is zero in the forward angle ($ \theta_{\rm c.m.}=0 $) and the backward angle ($ \theta_{\rm c.m.}=\pi $). In addition, the u-channel Σ exchange term mainly contributes to the backward angles. It should be emphasized that the contribution from the t-channel $ K^* $ exchange term is small and can be safely neglected for the process $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $, which is consistent with the results of Ref. [28].

      Figure 2.  (color online) $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ differential cross sections as a function of $ \rm{cos \theta_{\rm c.m.}} $ are plotted for $ \gamma n $-invariant mass intervals $ \left(\rm in\ \rm GeV \ units \right) $. The black curve labeled as "Total" represent the results of all the contributions, including the t-, s-, and u-channels and the contact term. The blue-dot and red-dashed curves denote the contributions from the effective Lagrangian approach u-channel Σ exchange and t-channel K exchange mechanisms, respectively. The magenta-dot-dashed and green-dot-dashed curves represent the contributions of the s-channel and t-channel $ K^{*} $ exchange diagrams, respectively, whereas the cyan-dot-dashed curves represent the contributions of the contact term.

      As mentioned in Sec. II, in addition to the pseudoscalar coupling of Eq. (5), the vertex of $ KN\Sigma $ may also be described with the Lagrangian density of axial-vector coupling [Eq. (8)]. We also present the contribution from the u-channel Σ exchange with the Lagrangian densities of Eqs. (5) and (8) in Fig. 3; we find that both of them contribute to the backward angles. Because the contribution from the u-channel is small, it is expected that either pseudoscalar coupling or axial-vector coupling for $ KN\Sigma $ does not affect our results significantly.

      Figure 3.  (color online) $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ differential cross sections with only the contribution from u-channel Σ exchange. The magenta-dot-dashed curves represent the results obtained with the axial-vector coupling of Eq. (8), and the blue-dotted curves represent the results obtained with the pseudoscalar coupling of Eq. (5).

      In addition to the differential cross sections, we also calculate the total cross section of the $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ reaction as a function of the initial photon energy. The results are shown in Fig. 4. The black curve labeled as "Total" represents the results of all the contributions, including the t-, s-, and u-channels and the contact term. The blue-dot and red-dashed curves represent the contributions from the u-channel Σ exchange and t-channel K exchange mechanisms, respectively. The magenta-dot-dashed and green-dot curves represent the contributions of the s-channel and t-channel $ K^{*} $ exchange diagrams, respectively, whereas the cyan-dot-dashed curve represents the contribution of the contact term. For the $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ reaction, its total cross section attains a maximum value of approximately $ 4.2 ~\mu $b at $ E_{\gamma}=2.4 \ \rm GeV $. It is expected that $ \Sigma^*(1480) $ can be observed by future experiments in the process $ \gamma n \to K^{+} \Sigma^{*-}\left(1480\right) \to \Sigma^{-}\pi^{0}/\Sigma^{0}\pi^{-}/\Sigma^{-}\gamma $.

      Figure 4.  (color online) Total cross section for $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*}_{1/2^-} $ is plotted as a function of the lab energy $ E_{\gamma} $. The black curve labeled as "Total" represents the results of all the contributions, including the t-, s-, and u-channels and the contact term. The blue-dot and red-dashed curves represent the contributions from the effective Lagrangian approach u-channel Σ exchange and t-channel K exchange mechanisms, respectively. The magenta-dot-dashed and green-dot curves represent the contributions of the s-channel nucleon term and t-channel $ K^{*} $ exchange diagrams, respectively, whereas the cyan-dot-dashed curve represents the contribution of the contact term.

      Finally, we show the total cross section for $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ with the cut-off $ \Lambda_{s/u}=1.2 $, $ 1.5 $, and $ 1.8 $ GeV in Fig. 5. We find that the total cross sections are weakly dependent on the value of the cut-off. Because the precise couplings of $\Sigma^*(1480)$ are still unknown, future experiments would benefit from constraining these couplings if the state $\Sigma^*(1480)$ is confirmed.

      Figure 5.  (color online) Total cross section for $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*}_{1/2^-} $ with the cut-off $ \Lambda_{s/u}=1.2 $, $ 1.5 $, and $ 1.8 $ GeV.

    IV.   SUMMARY
    • The lowest $ \Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ is far from established, and its existence is important to understand low-lying excited baryons with $ J^P=1/2^- $. There are many experimental hints of $ \Sigma^*(1480) $, as listed in the previous version of the RPP. We propose to search for this state in the photoproduction process to confirm its existence.

      Assuming that the $ J^{P} = 1/2^{-} $ low lying state $ \Sigma^*\left(1480\right) $ has a sizeable coupling to $ \bar{K}N $ according to the study of Ref. [37], we phenomenologically investigate the $ \gamma n \to K^{+} \Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ reaction by considering the contributions from the t-channel $ K/K^* $ exchange term, s-channel nucleon term, u-channel Σ exchange term, and contact term within the Regge-effective Lagrangian approach. The differential and total cross sections for these processes are calculated with our model parameters. The total cross section of $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ is approximately $4.2 ~ \mu$b around $ E_{\gamma}=2.4 \ \rm GeV $. We encourage our experimental colleagues to further measure the $ \gamma n \to K^{+}\Sigma^{*-}_{1/2^-} $ process.

    APPENDIX A: t-CHANNEL K EXCHANGE IN THE FORWARD/BACKWARD ANGLE
    • In this appendix, we show that the contributions from the t-channel K exchange in the forward angle ($ \theta=0 $) and backward angle ($ \theta=\pi $) are zero. In the c.m frame, the four-momenta of the outgoing K are

      $ k_2^0 = \frac{s+m^2_K-M^2_{\Sigma^*}}{2\sqrt{s}}, \tag{A1} $

      $ k_2^1 = |\vec{k}_2^{\rm c.m.}| {\rm sin}\theta, \tag{A2}$

      $ k_2^2 = 0, \tag{A3} $

      $ k_2^3 = |\vec{k}_2^{\rm c.m.}| {\rm cos}\theta, \tag{A4} $

      where $ \vec{k}_2^{\rm c.m.} $ is the three-momentum of K [Eq. (21)]. The polarization vectors of the photon with momentum $ \vec{k}_1^{\rm c.m.} $ in the helicity basis are

      $ \epsilon (\vec{k}_1^{\rm c.m.}, \lambda=\pm 1) = \pm \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left( \begin{array}{c} 0 \\ 1 \\ \mp {\rm i} \\ 0 \end{array} \right), \tag{A5}$

      $ \epsilon (\vec{k}_1^{\rm c.m.}, \lambda=0) = 0. \tag{A6} $

      We can easily find that $ k_2^\mu \epsilon_\mu(\vec{k}_1^{\rm c.m.},\lambda=0,\pm 1)=0 $ for $\theta= 0,\pi$, which implies that the amplitude of Eq. (11) for t-channel K exchange will be zero in the forward angle ($ \theta=0 $) and backward angle ($ \theta=\pi $).

Reference (56)

目录

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return